Print Friendly, PDF & Email

{published in the Colorado Springs Gazette, 8-23-07}

Full disclosure: My wife got good grades in law school. She graduated third in her class. She practices law with a firm downtown that only hires lawyers with good grades, just like every attorney there.

Full disclosure: I got good grades in graduate school (though I was nowhere near third in my class). That helped me get on the faculty at one of the most selective institutions in American higher education.

There, I give out grades. Good ones to those who master the material, bad ones to those who do not.  That is my job. It is, I think, an important one.

So when it comes to today’s topic, I might be biased. I actually believe in things like academic excellence and intellectual merit. I believe that right answers are better than wrong answers, that people can differ in their ability to distinguish between the two, and that identifying those who can do that well is an important social good.

Grades, professional careers, and academic excellence are in the news thanks to the President of the National Urban League. In an interview that made national news, published in the Gazette last week,Marc Morial talked about law firms and diversity. It turns out that lawyers at the best firms want to hireonly applicants who got good grades in law school. This, apparently, is bad.

Grades in post-secondary education exist to solve an important social problem: discovering who is goodat what. It is highly beneficial to society to identify individuals with intellectual ability and professionalskill, so that people can find them when they need them. That’s how things like “reputation” and“prestige” work. It’s also important for smart people to find and work with other smart people.  Professional ability is best when leveraged.

No one is suggesting that grades are the only thing professional firms should consider. There are plentyof straight-A law school and medical students who have no business being around people. That’s whylaw firms and residency programs do interviews. Where you went to school is important too. Someplaces are a lot tougher than others. Grades aren’t perfect, but they’re a pretty good indicator ofwhether or not you can do what you trained for and how you compare with your peers.

Morial’s comments were particularly insulting to the minorities he claims to defend. They imply that minority law students can’t get as good grades as white students. Since he doesn’t claim discrimination by a conspiracy of racist law professors (good thing too, since there’s no evidence for it), I can only assume that he’s given up the fight. He seems to imply that the only way non-whites will ever be proportionally represented in American law firms is if lawyers with good grades stop asking for the same in the associates they hire.

Let’s do a little thought experiment. Suppose you were accused of a crime, or your kid got into trouble, or someone decided to sue you. Whatever it is, you need a lawyer. You’ve heard good things about Smith & Jones, so you stop by their office. On their front door you find a newly painted sign:

“The law firm of Smith and Jones now supports the hiring policies of the National Urban League. We are proud to announce that, in support of the visual diversity of our professional staff, we have reduced the emphasis we place on the academic performance of applicants for positions with the firm.”

Would you want them to represent you?

The National Urban League is right when they declare that urban black America is in crisis. They are right in that the standard “solutions” of modern politics have not worked. At the risk of stating the obvious, they are also right in that racism in America has not gone away.

But they are wrong if they believe that lower academic standards for law firms, or medical practices, or any professional organization, are the answer. That would be unfair to those who use professional services, unfair to everyone who meets high standards, and unfair in the long run to those it supposed to help. If you ever have wondered what the phrase “soft bigotry of low expectations” means, look no further.